Collection active · 20 JUL 2026 08:30Z

Open-source intelligence,
delivered with the discipline
of a national-intelligence shop.

PIS is a private intelligence service. We turn global news, event data, sanctions lists, and specialist feeds into sourced, confidence-rated briefings — delivered daily, with flash alerts when the picture changes.

0+
Sources monitored
Flash alert latency
0/7
Collection cycle
ICD-0
Probability standard
Archive

Past editions, kept in the open.

Every public briefing PIS publishes lives here, in full — so you can check the track record instead of taking our word for it. Nothing gets quietly removed.

The published archive is loading — every edition since launch stays here, unedited.

Capabilities

Four functions. One continuous cycle.

Every briefing PIS produces passes through the same pipeline — collection, analysis, review, delivery — with the same standards applied to every line.

01 / CONTINUOUS COLLECTION

Continuous collection

Automated ingestion from global news wires, GDELT event data, OFAC/EU/UK/UN sanctions lists, and a curated set of specialist feeds. No gaps, no lag.

02 / ANALYTIC RIGOR

Analytic rigor

Every assessment uses ICD-203 probability language — LIKELY, HIGHLY LIKELY, with stated confidence bands. No hedging without precision. No claims without sourcing.

03 / INDICATORS & WARNING

Indicators & warning

Standing indicators track escalation across geopolitical, security, financial, and cyber domains. Thresholds are defined in advance; alerts are triggered by evidence, not instinct.

04 / FLASH ALERTS

Flash alerts

When a material change is detected — a designation, an interdiction, a shift in a watched corridor — a sourced flash reaches your inbox within minutes, not hours.

Method

A five-stage cycle, run continuously.

The pipeline mirrors the discipline used by institutional analytic shops. Each stage has defined inputs, outputs, and review gates.

01

Collection

Automated ingestion from curated feeds. Sanctions lists, news wires, event data, specialist feeds.

02

Processing

Deduplication, entity resolution, translation, and structured tagging across domains.

03

Analysis

Multi-model assessment with explicit confidence bands, alternative hypotheses, and source attribution.

04

Dissemination

Daily briefings, flash alerts, and on-demand products delivered to encrypted channels.

05

Feedback

Client input refines collection priorities, watchlists, and analytic focus for the next cycle.

Capability

What this is, and what it is not

The boundary of the product, stated plainly, so an assessment can be read for what it is.

Open sources only

Every assessment is derived from publicly available material: news feeds, official publications, sanctions and treaty records, public event datasets, and open technical feeds such as ADS-B and AIS. Collection is limited to what any member of the public could lawfully obtain.

No privileged collection

PIS operates no collection capability beyond open sources, holds no relationship with any government body, and has access to no material that is restricted. Where an assessment turns on something only a privileged source could establish, the assessment says so and stops there.

No profiles of private individuals

The system records organisations, states, companies, places, official roles, and persons subject to published sanctions or designated as politically exposed. It does not build or hold a searchable record of private individuals, and a reporter's byline is not stored as an entity.

It fails closed

When collection degrades, the product reports the gap rather than filling it. A brief written from a thin or failed collection window is labelled as such, and an alert whose sourcing cannot be resolved is held back rather than published with a confident-looking attribution. Absence of evidence is reported as absence.

Machine-assisted, human-shaped

Assessments are produced by language models working to fixed analytic prompts, under automated gates that check sourcing and internal consistency before anything is published. The gates are mechanical. They reduce error; they do not remove it.

Corrections are published

When a published assessment is wrong, the correction is published with its own timestamp and reason, and the original is left standing so the record of what was said, and when, remains intact.

Sample product

What a PIS briefing looks like.

A representative daily assessment. BLUF-first. Sourced. Confidence-rated. This is a sample — real products follow the same structure for the topics you define.

DTG 20 JUL 2026 08:30Z PERIOD 06–20 JUL 2026 REF PIS-BSC-2026-0720
OPEN SOURCE // PIS ASSESSMENT
Black Sea grain-corridor watch — sanctions-designation cascade and narrative divergence
BLUF
Event-stream volume, new sanctions-list activity, and social-media narrative tracking over the past 14 days converge on a Black Sea grain-corridor risk picture. PIS assesses with moderate-to-high confidence that recent designation actions are LIKELY 55–85% linked to a previously tracked network, while the absence of a corresponding UN Security Council listing leaves an enforcement gap. No indicator has crossed the ALERT threshold; the picture is presented at WATCH.
Key findings
  1. 01
    GDELT event volume tagged to the corridor rose 42% over the past 14 days, cross-referenced against ISW's daily assessment of the same theater. Pattern is HIGHLY LIKELY 85–95% consistent with a genuine shift in operational tempo rather than reporting noise. [ GDELT event stream · ISW daily assessment · PIS collection ]
  2. 02
    OFAC and EU Consolidated List updates in the period added 4 new entries linked to a previously tracked network; UN SC and UK HMT show no corresponding action — LIKELY 55–85% a jurisdictional gap rather than an intelligence gap, since the entities are already known. [ OFAC SDN · EU Consolidated List · UN SC · UK HMT ]
  3. 03
    SOCMINT monitoring of tracked Telegram channels shows a threefold rise in chatter volume referencing the corridor, with narrative framing diverging sharply by audience language — LIKELY 55–85% consistent with a coordinated narrative push rather than an organic reaction. [ SOCMINT collection · PIS narrative tracker ]
Indicators & warnings
WATCH Further designation actions matching the same network pattern.
WATCH Narrative convergence across the currently diverging channel clusters.
ALERT Any UN Security Council listing action — would be the first of the assessment period and would close the enforcement gap.
Sources & coverage

Open sources. Global reach. Curated.

PIS does not claim access to classified material. We collect only from legitimate open sources — and we curate aggressively to separate signal from noise.

News & wire aggregation

Event & conflict data

Sanctions & regulatory

Signals & monitoring

Country coverage

Per-country reports, built from what we actually collect.

Structured sanctions data (verified, official) joined with an LLM-synthesized narrative background (analytic framing, not independently fact-checked) — the two are always labeled separately, never blended into one claim.

Loading coverage list…

Why PIS

The rigor of an institutional shop — open to everyone.

Enterprise terminals are built for traders, not analysts. Government assessments are classified. PIS occupies the space between — serious analytic discipline, delivered to the people who need it, kept free and sustained by its readers.

Criterion
Enterprise terminals
PIS
Analytic standard
News aggregation, limited assessment
ICD-203 probability language, sourced
Flash latency
Hours, dependent on editorial cycle
Minutes, triggered by threshold
Indicators & warning
Ad hoc, analyst-dependent
Standing indicators, pre-defined thresholds
Client relationship
Seat license, generic product
Named desk, tailored collection
Cost to read
Enterprise seat license
Free — reader-funded
Security & discretion

Your watchlist is not our marketing material.

We handle client information with the same discipline we apply to source material. What you ask us to watch, and what we send you, stays between us.

Data handling

All collection is open-source. Client data is stored encrypted at rest and in transit, with strict access controls and audit logging.

Client confidentiality

We do not publish client names, watchlists, or the subjects of our work. NDA is standard; discretion is structural, not contractual.

Delivery channels

Daily briefings via encrypted email. Flash alerts via Session, secure portal, or your preferred channel. No public-facing dashboards.

Access

Free to read. Funded by readers.

No paywall, no seat license. PIS is sustained by donations, not subscriptions — so the analysis reaches everyone who needs it, and supporters keep it running and growing.

Read

The daily briefing and flash alerts, delivered to your inbox. Free, for anyone who needs the signal.

  • Daily BLUF-first briefing
  • Flash alerts on material change
  • Standing indicators & warnings
  • Encrypted email delivery
Join the list
Contribute

Funding buys collection and compute — nothing else. Every item below is a capability PIS does not have today, and the reason why.

  • Maritime AIS — dropped Aug 2026, feed is paid
  • Conflict-event data — no institutional access
  • Frontline assessments — behind a paywall
  • Cloud inference when local models fail
  • A GPU, to end CPU-bound analysis
See what it buys
Share

Know something that matters? Send it to us — openly, or anonymously over Tor. We protect our sources.

  • Confidential tip line (Tor)
  • PGP-encrypted email
  • No logs, no identity recorded
  • Text submissions
Share information
Funding

What money actually buys.

Named gaps, with the reason each one exists. If a line here is ever closed, it moves to the capability list and says who paid for it. Nothing on this page is a plan — it is the current state.

Collection — what PIS cannot currently see

Maritime traffic (AIS). Vessel tracking ran until August 2026 and was switched off: the feed became a paid service and PIS has no budget for it. This is the single largest blind spot — chokepoints, sanctioned-fleet movement and port activity are all currently invisible.

Conflict event data. Structured incident datasets of the ACLED class require institutional access PIS does not have. Conflict reporting therefore rests on news collection alone, which is slower and thinner than event-level data.

Frontline assessments. The main open frontline-assessment publisher moved fully behind bot protection in August 2026. Every free route was tested and none work. Reaching it again means paying for access — otherwise daily Ukraine and Russia coverage rests on general news feeds.

Compute — why analysis is slower than it should be

Reliable model inference. PIS runs its models locally, on its own hardware, at no cost. On structured extraction — pulling indicators and entities out of text — the local setup fails outright and the work has to fall back to processor-only models that take minutes per document. Paid inference is the difference between a report at 05:00 and a report at 05:00 that is actually complete.

Graphics hardware. The machine has no dedicated GPU. The integrated one miscomputes on exactly the workloads that matter, so the pipeline routes around it. A single card removes that constraint for every agent at once.

What funding does not buy

No salaries, no marketing, no office. If PIS ever spends on anything other than collection and compute, it will say so here first.

Analytic standards

Tradecraft, not technology.

PIS is built on a simple premise: the discipline used by institutional intelligence services — structured collection, explicit probability language, sourced assessment, standing indicators — can be delivered to private clients without the overhead, classification, or institutional inertia.

We use AI as a tool in the pipeline, not as the analyst. Every assessment is reviewed against source material, alternative hypotheses are considered, and confidence is stated — never implied. When we do not know something, we say so.

PIS is not affiliated with any government body, intelligence service, or multinational organization. We are an independent private service, staffed by analysts with institutional backgrounds, operating entirely within open-source legal frameworks.

  • Probability languageICD-203
  • Source attributionEvery line
  • Alternative hypothesesRequired
  • Confidence bandsStated, not implied
  • Collection basisOpen source only
  • Review cycleContinuous
  • Client confidentialityStructural
Support the work

PIS runs today. Funding makes it faster and deeper.

We are honest about how this operates. PIS runs now on a dedicated server and the free tiers of the AI and data services it depends on. It works — but free tiers are rate-limited and throttled, so information arrives slower and coverage is narrower than it could be. Donations do one thing: unlock paid tiers and premium feeds. Every contribution buys speed and depth — nothing else.

Now — free tiers

Daily briefings. Core open sources. Alerts batched to the collection cycle. Analysis paced by rate limits.

Funded — paid tiers

Near-real-time flash alerts. Expanded premium sources. Faster, deeper multi-model analysis on every briefing.

Figures posted manually by the operator — this bar does not update in real time.

Donation channels are being set up. They will appear here, and only here, once they are live. We will never send you a donation address in a DM, comment, or unsolicited email: treat any address given to you that way as hostile.

Want to contribute? Now is your time — we are evolving.

Free tiers got PIS running. Your support turns those limits into real-time, deeper intelligence — and pushes us onto better models and sources.

FAQ

The questions we'd ask too.

Why is this free?

Because gating serious analysis behind a seat license defeats the point of open-source intelligence — the people who most need the signal (independent researchers, journalists, small NGOs, the just-curious) are usually the ones who can't afford an enterprise terminal. PIS runs on donations instead, so reading it costs nothing.

What does my donation actually buy?

Nothing but throughput. PIS runs today on free-tier AI models and free or rate-limited data feeds — it works, but slower and shallower than it could. Every donation moves a line item on the funding roadmap above: a paid model tier, a faster collection cycle, a premium sanctions or event feed. No line item is "team salary" or "marketing" — there is no team and no marketing budget.

Who runs PIS?

An independent, self-funded operator — not a company, agency, or government body. See Standards for what "independent" means in practice.

Is this affiliated with a government or intelligence service?

No. PIS collects and analyzes only open-source material and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representative of any government body, intelligence service, or multinational organization.

How anonymous is the confidential channel, really?

The .onion tip line and PGP-encrypted email hide content, and hide network origin if — and only if — you use them correctly (Tor Browser, no identifying details in the message). The plain contact form is convenient, not anonymous — it carries your email address. See Share confidentially for the honest breakdown of what each channel actually protects.

What does "open-source only" rule out?

Classified material, paid access we haven't licensed, and anything we're not lawfully entitled to hold. If a finding needs a source we don't have, the briefing says so — a stated confidence band, not a guess dressed up as one.

Collection requirements

What we cannot see right now.

These are the gaps in our own collection, measured — not a wish list. Each one names a country we are not covering well enough to assess, and what would actually help. The list changes as coverage changes.

 

Loading current requirements…

Contact

Join the list, or share something.

Two ways to reach us — an open channel for access enquiries and non-sensitive tips, and a confidential channel for sources who need to stay anonymous.

Join the list / send a tip

For access enquiries or a non-sensitive tip you're comfortable attaching your name to. Opens a pre-filled message in your own email client — nothing is sent or stored by this page.

This channel is not anonymous — it carries your email address. For anonymous submissions, use the confidential channel on the right.

Share confidentially

For sources who need to protect their identity. Choose the channel that fits how sensitive your information is.

  • Anonymous Our confidential tip line, reachable over the Tor network. Submissions are encrypted before they reach us and your identity is never recorded.
    http://4gvo3ry74gaeum43g3yj3p446wzu6kumfecwkkumieku6wmyz6gdmlqd.onion
  • Encrypted Email us using our PGP public key. This hides the content of your message. Verify the fingerprint before sending.
    9CB1 726D 2C68 43CB 04EC  015A EDC6 01EB C667 A770
  • Session A direct, encrypted line for time-sensitive contact — no phone number required, unlike Signal. Session ID provided on request via the channels above.
Read this first. A normal web form — including the one on the left — is not anonymous; it reveals your address and network. For genuine anonymity, open the .onion address in the Tor Browser and do not include details that could identify you. Only submit information you are lawfully entitled to share.
Checking live collection status…